I’ve decided to try a different approach with this new essay. So far, I’ve mostly written about myself, which may not be that interesting, so this time around, the writing will be observational, or about the things I observe wherever I go. So, in a way, I guess it’s still about me. Oh well. I’m sitting at Fainting Goat Coffee in Spring Hill, TN writing this. When I walk in, Chuck Berry is playing. The next song to come on is by Michael Jackson. In the lobby, there are portraits of *goat* versions of celebrities. There’s the goat version of Spock, David Bowie, and Queen Elizabeth. So as soon as I walk in, I’m immediately bombarded with Berry, Jackson, and Bowie, all of questionable character (look it up). But Berry did time in prison, and Jackson had a lengthy court process, so at least there was some accountability for their actions, despite their status. Bowie just seemed live his best life, all his life. And his crimes, as far as I know, are undisputed. To borrow a phrase from Paul Mooney, he had “the complexion for the protection.” Now, I’ve heard people try to frame the pointing out of these double-standards as being some type of apologist. This is not the case. All people should be held accountable, but double standards promote inequality in a way that holding none accountable would not. The real problem is that most people don’t even care about truth. They choose to apply nuance strategically, and only when it’s advantageous to them or their argument. However, I am no expert on social justice or debate strategies, and am probably not saying anything new, so I digress. This does bring about an idea for new writing material though: writing about rhetoric. I’ve been thinking about Frankenstein’s influence and how some horror fiction is derivative of it with common themes, but that’s considered okay. I don’t think the same hackneyed approach would be tolerated in a philosophical treatise.
…
There are videos on YouTube of David Foster Wallace talking about how everyone always feels the need to be distracted by something. (Look them up or message me for the link. The videos are good.) His words are somewhat prophetic, considering how everybody’s obsessed with their phones nowadays. He talked about how there’s always music in the background in public places. Although he said the music is usually bad, that’s not the case at Fainting Goat today. They played “Shout,” by the Isley Brothers, which is fire! I’d mostly heard a short-form version of that song in commercials, so it was cool to hear the whole song with all that awesome screaming. I love old-school R&B because it’s so genuine. Last time I was here, they were playing hipster music, which I’m not crazy about. Perhaps it’s good for coffee shops though, as background music, rather than more aggressive music that’s meant to be in the foreground. Hipster music is like modern-day elevator music. There are some nice ladies sitting in my vicinity, having a conversation. One of them asked me if they were bothering me. I told her “No, it’s fine,” which is true. Background noise doesn’t bother me when I’m writing like it does when I’m reading, so I’m thinking that most coffee shops are best suited for writing. In fact, the place is booming right now, so I’d probably have a fit if I tried to read something. But it’s great for writing since it gives you something to draw from. Billy Joel is playing now, which takes me back to a very specific point in time. I had quit my job at Sara Lee. Since I had newfound free time, I would drive to an all-night restaurant in Florence, AL in the wee hours of the morning. I’d listen to Joel’s greatest hits in the car. That was kind of random, but who cares? That’s how my mind works a lot of the time; one thought will trigger another thought that is not *obviously* related. That’s sort of how this essay is too, with the new paragraph separated by three dots indicating a small break in the thought process. The brain is such a complex organ that we will never be able to fully understand it. I recently finished reading Wuthering Heights, and the story affected me emotionally. For some reason, I associate the song “Don’t Look back in Anger” by Oasis with the ending of that book. When I hear the song, I immediately think of the dedication Heathcliff had to Catherine. The thing is, the lyrics to the song have nothing to do with Wuthering Heights whatsoever. In fact, the lyrics don’t make any sense at all. So, it’s the song’s melody that I associate with it. It’s true that I was listening to the song and reading the book in the same time period, but I was also listening to other music. It’s like I made my own movie soundtrack; it reminds me of Jung’s synchronicity.